West is currently serving as Fleet Master Chief, U.S. Fleet Forces Command and previously served as Fleet Master Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet. He brings to this assignment 27 years of fleet experience, including six tours at sea highlighted by leadership positions aboard submarines and surface ships. In addition to his experience as Fleet Master Chief in the Pacific and Atlantic, he served as Chief of the Boat in USS Portsmouth (SSN 707), Command Master Chief in USS Preble (DDG 88), and Submarine Squadron 11, and Force Master Chief, Submarine Force U.S. Pacific Fleet.

“From my earliest days in the Navy, and throughout my career, Chief Petty Officers have shaped and influenced me. Master Chief West has the experience, insight and confidence to continue to provide me that which I need to hear, not want to hear. He will have that degree of access and trust. I look forward to working closely with him in all that is ahead,” Roughead said.

In the NAVADMIN, Roughead also praised MCPON (SW/FMF) Joe R. Campa Jr., who took the helm in July 2006, citing numerous milestones Campa achieved in his time serving as the senior enlisted member of the Navy.

“MCPON Campa can take great pride in his many contributions during his watch. His extraordinary leadership, keen insight, and sound judgment enhanced the role of the Chief Petty Officer. He authored the Chief Petty Officer’s mission, vision, guiding principles, revitalized the Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy’s Leadership Mess, and empowered Fleet, Force, and Command Master Chiefs. Most importantly, he re-established the deckplate leadership that is the essence of a U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer. His efforts significantly increased the impact of Navy Senior Enlisted Leaders and, in doing so, improved the readiness of the Navy,” Roughead said.

The Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy serves as an advisor to the Chief of Naval Operations and to the Chief of Naval Personnel in matters of importance to enlisted personnel and their families. The MCPON is also an advisor to the many boards focused on enlisted personnel issues; is the enlisted representative of the Department of the Navy at special events; may be called upon to testify on enlisted personnel issues before Congress; and, maintains a liaison with enlisted spouse organizations.

“I think there’s [a] substantial amount of additional analytical work to be done,” John Young, the Pentagon’s acquisition chief, told reporters during a briefing yesterday.

“We certainly have a requirement for future surface combatants,” he said.

Young has been at odds with Navy officials as the two sides try to determine the best path forward for destroyers. Until earlier this year, the Navy had been on a path to build seven DDG-1000 multi-mission combat ships. However, by mid-year, the Navy told lawmakers that a rapidly changing threat environment called for truncating the Zumwalt-class ships at three and restarting the DDG-51 class of Arleigh Burke destroyers.

Young was the Navy’s top acquisition official as the service began to develop plans for DDG-1000, known back then as DD(X).

Yesterday, Young told reporters, at low rates of production, initial estimates show building additional Arleigh Burkes will be very expensive.

“The DDGs at low rates of production may well cost on the order of $2 billion at that point in time,” he said.

The Navy plan now calls for restarting the DDG-51 line in the 2010 time frame and building eight of the destroyers.

The Navy has General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman under contract to build DDG-1000 and -1001, respectively. Each ship is expected to cost in the range of $3.3 billion.

“Lead ships carry some amount of design [cost], so if you peel that away, the lead ships are about $2.5 billion, and they would go down from there as we go down the learning curve,” Young said. “Would I pay a little bit more money to get a hull that can support more radar, [is] acoustically quiet, magnetically quiet, and has a low radar signature?

“Can I go in and work hard on the DDGs at low rate production and get that cost down? Because that’s where we need to have the discussion,” he added.

This is not a decision about five years from now, this is a decision about 20 years from now, Young added.

“So can I live with a ’60s…’70s vintage hull in the 2030 time frame? Or do I need a hull that has some of those additional features for the threat in that environment,” he said. “To finish this debate we really need to get some…construction returns on 1000 and get a better feel for what it is going to cost.”

The Navy does have a legitimate concern that if the DDG-1000s become significantly more expensive than the cost targets projected, it might be hard for the service to afford the ship, Young noted.

“But we have not done enough analysis, especially analysis looking forward as far as the time period when these ships will be a vital part of [the nation's security],” he added. “We ought to lay in some flexibility in the budget through that analytical work and make a decision. And there are some near-term decision to be made.”

For example, Young said, if DDG-1000 is not the hull for the future, building three ships between two yards could be punitively expensive for the taxpayer.

“We are certainly talking internally, and we talk with industry, and industry are willing to talk to the Navy and Pentagon about these issues,” Young said. “But those are just discussions at this time.”

Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael Monsoor, 25, was killed during a firefight in Ramadi, Iraq, in 2006 when he smothered an insurgent’s grenade to save three fellow SEALs.

“Those who served with Michael Monsoor will remember him always as a consummate professional who faced terrorist enemies with aplomb and stoicism,” Navy Secretary Donald Winter said in announcing the decision during a speech in New York.

Born in Long Beach, Monsoor attended Garden Grove High School, where he played football.

Monsoor graduated in 1999 and he enlisted in the Navy in 2001.

He completed SEAL training on a second try after an injury thwarted his first attempt. He was awarded a Silver Star for bravery for an incident during the same deployment in which he was killed.

During a firefight in Ramadi, Monsoor and other SEALs were assigned to a roof to provide watch for ground troops. When an insurgent hurled a grenade onto the roof, Monsoor yelled, “Grenade!” and dived on the explosive.

“Michael could have escaped and saved himself,” Winter told those at the Navy SEAL Warrior Fund gala. “But he chose a different path, a path of honor that embodies the way of a Navy SEAL.”

The latest Zumwalt-class destroyer is being designed to provide enhanced surveillance and weapon-delivery capability close to shore. Completion of the ship is set for early in the next decade.

I guess he was the Duty Corpsman:
http://docinthebox.blogspot.com/2008/10/annual-airshow-duty.html

But he got some cool MAGTF photos:

http://docinthebox.blogspot.com/2008/10/miramar-air-show-2008-magtf-display.html

And some really sweet F-22 Raptor photos:

http://docinthebox.blogspot.com/2008/10/mcas-miramar-2008-airshow-f-22-raptor.html

Thanks for everything you do for us, doc. I hope our paths cross one day. The closest I’ve been to you is in Imperial Beach, CA with Group 1, look me up on Global if you ever come to VA.

In about two weeks, dozens of young adults from across the country will head to Naval Station Great Lakes for a muscle-punishing boot camp and a meeting with their celebrity “mentor” — NASCAR driver Dale Earnhardt Jr.

The racing superstar may be headed to the Lake County naval base in part to express patriotism, but he’s also performing one of the duties laid out in his $800,000 speaking-appearance contract with the Navy. It hired him to be a spokesman this year with hopes of recruiting a few of NASCAR’s millions of fans.

As the Iraq War becomes increasingly less popular in the eyes of the American public and recruiting more difficult, Navy officials say this is the first time they’ve turned to a celebrity recruiter for help. Navy officials have long joked Tom Cruise in “Top Gun” was a great unofficial celebrity recruiter, but that movie came out in 1986, when many of today’s enlistees weren’t born.

As part of its separate $6.5 million racing-sponsorship deal with Earnhardt, who is named after his late racing father, the Navy named a special division after him and bought the right to paint the Navy’s name on a car now raced by an up-and-coming driver on Earnhardt’s team, Brad Keselowski.

The special divisions, like one the Navy has named after the White Sox, appeal to young people who may be tempted to join the Navy if they can find a slightly different experience, or want to express their fan support, said Lt. J.G. Andrea Ross, the Navy’s NASCAR program manager. Navy officials said the one-year contract includes at least 22 appearances at Navy-related events by Keselowski, and at least seven by Earnhardt.

“It’s largely a recruiting effort and a branding tool,” Ross said.

Earnhardt will be “mentoring” his recruits, Ross said, and will be at the base in Lake County to meet them when boot camp starts later this month.

When Tanya House enlisted in the Navy in April, the recruiter asked her if she’d be interested in joining the Dale Jr. Division.

House, 18, of Cromwell, Minn., hoped the Navy would help her get medical training for a possible career as a dental hygienist, and the question gave her pause. “I didn’t know what to think of it,” House said later. “It sounded like I’d be working on cars.”

But House said the recruiter told her the division was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and so she figured, “Why not?”

With that, House became the first member of the Dale Jr. Division. This summer, the Navy flew her and a few of the other earliest Dale Jr. enlistees to Charlotte, N.C., to watch a race and meet the star trackside.

House, who had only left Minnesota once before, skipped graduation for her 26-person senior class at Cromwell-Wright High and headed to the race.

“We were down by the action and everything, and it was really cool,” said House, who received an autographed cap from Earnhardt. “It was beyond expectations.”

Professor David Segal, director of the Center on Research on Military Organization at the University of Maryland, said the Navy’s relationship with Earnhardt says less about the Navy than it does about the way young people emulate celebrities and are influenced by celebrity endorsement. It also reflects how mainstream NASCAR has become, he said.

“It used to be a fringe sport, and now it’s gentrified. It went from redneck to middle class,” Segal said.

People who watch NASCAR already have a characteristic needed in the military, Segal said: “[The] people who are interested in it like action.”

The Navy wanted Earnhardt’s 88-person division, ideally, to be 50-50 male-female. That was a stretch, because only 15 percent of the Navy is female. As of Thursday, 77 people had signed up for the division; 22 women and 55 men.

NASCAR, a once solidly good ol’ boy sport, has changed in a way that may have helped the Navy: NASCAR officials say 40 percent of the fan base is female.

Navy officials said their decision not to continue the program next year was a strategic one.

“The recruiting market is very challenging today, and the Navy needs to remain flexible,” Naval Service Training Command Deputy Public Affairs Officer Todd Willebrand said in an e-mail. “This has nothing to do with the team relationship, the fan base or leadership of NASCAR.”

In statements released by his publicist and in other comments at news conferences, Earnhardt said he was disappointed his sponsorship by the Navy won’t continue, but he looks forward to working with the recruits.

House said she’s running and lifting weights in preparation for moving to Great Lakes in mid-August.

“I haven’t seen many other cultures,” said House. “I want to be able to see more.”

First of all, c’mon people! Do you really think a site named “Gear Adrift” is going to have the latest advancement results? Secondly, why do you think google would lead you to the right place? It’s a great search engine but if you don’t know about the results, why would google? It’s not like google is in the Navy, after all.

So, here’s my bright idea to help you fellow rate-grabbers out. I’m going to compile a tracker of exactly when the various Navy advancement results have come out.

Navy Advancement Results Tracker

• Jan 2008, CYCLE 198 Chief (E7) Advancement Results – 01 AUG 2008
• Mar 2008, CYCLE 199 (E4, E5, E6) Advancement Results – 22 MAY 2008
• Sep 2007, CYCLE 195 (E4, E5, E6) Advancement Results – 16 NOV 2007

LCS is a fast, agile, focused-mission ship designed to defeat asymmetric “anti-access” threats such as mines, quiet diesel submarines and fast surface craft. The 378-foot Freedom is being designed and built by a Lockheed Martin-led industry team.

“Getting Freedom underway is a significant step in the ship’s steady progress toward entering the fleet,” said LCS Program Manager Capt. James Murdoch. “Freedom has overcome many challenges to reach this important milestone. LCS 1 will add tremendous capabilities to the fleet for our Sailors.”

Builder’s trials test the vessel’s propulsion, communications, navigation and mission systems, as well as all related support systems. Following the completion of builder’s trials, Freedom will return to Marinette Marine to prepare for acceptance trials that will be conducted by the U.S. Navy’s Board of Inspection and Survey.

The LCS 1 Freedom class consists of two different hullforms – a semiplaning monohull and an aluminum trimaran – designed and built by two industry teams, respectively led by Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics. The seaframes will be outfitted with reconfigurable payloads, called mission packages, which can be changed out quickly. These mission packages focus on three mission areas: mine counter measures, surface warfare and anti-submarine warfare.

LCS 1 is scheduled to be delivered to the Navy later this year and will be homeported in San Diego.

Changing threats at sea, including increased deployments of diesel-powered submarines by potential U.S. adversaries, drove the service’s move to end production of the futuristic DDG 1000 destroyer after just two ships, said Vice Adm. Barry McCullough, a deputy chief of naval operations.

In a House subcommittee hearing, congressional supporters of the ship countered that the Navy has not justified its new course, and they suggested that budget constraints – not military needs – are behind the change.

While the Navy puts the cost of each DDG 1000 now funded at $3.2 billion, a Congressional Budget Office analyst testified Thursday that the real price could be more than $5 billion per ship. CGX, a planned cruiser that will use many of the high-tech systems developed for DDG 1000, will be even more expensive, analyst Eric Labs said.

“This isn’t the first major ship acquisition program that has faced problems,” said Rep. Niki Tsongas, D-Mass. “Why does so much risk and inconsistency exist” in the Navy’s threat forecasts? she asked.

Tsongas read aloud from testimony McCullough delivered in April, in which the admiral asserted that the DDG 1000′s power to provide surface fire support and defeat missile threats exceeds that of today’s Arleigh Burke class of destroyers.

But McCullough and Allison Stiller, the Navy’s top civilian shipbuilding official, said Thursday that Navy leaders now believe that building more ships of the Burke class is the best way to counter increased “blue water” threats from submarines and ballistic missiles.

The DDG 1000 was designed for a closer-to-shore mission, including providing covering fire to troops ashore, they said. The new ship is to be equipped with a long-range gun able to reach targets more than 60 miles away and has a radar-evading hull form that will make it hard for adversaries to detect.

McCullough said Thursday that the Navy believes it has enough aircraft and cruise missiles, along with the promise of an improved gun to be placed on the Burke ships, to support forces ashore. And the Burke ships can accommodate missile-defense systems that are not suited for the DDG 1000, he asserted.

Congress funded what was expected to be the last in the Burke line of ships in 2005. The Navy wants $2.2 billion to restart the line in 2009, though the proposed change has not been approved by Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

The new plan also has split members of Congress, though along geographic rather than partisan lines.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers from New England, where some of the DDG 1000′s high-tech systems are being developed, is pushing for construction of at least one more of the ships and for more detail on how the Navy decided that just two would suffice.

Those members have a well-placed ally in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., who heads the Senate’s seapower subcommittee. The Navy appears to have an advantage in the House, however, where Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., head of the House seapower and expeditionary forces subcommittee, is a longtime proponent of the Burke class of ships.

Even before the Navy’s announcement that it now wants to move away from DDG 1000, the House voted to “pause” the program next year.

But in June, the Senate Armed Services Committee signed off continued production. Since then, key members including Virginia Sen. John Warner have warned that thousands of shipbuilder jobs are at risk if the new destroyer is abandoned.

Other lawmakers are skeptical about restarting the Burke line of ships. The House Appropriations Committee voted this week to provide $450 million next year to continue buying parts for a third DDG 1000 but included no funds for more Burke ships.